Airline Code [RYR]
View More Ryanair News
Tags :UK, Ryanair, tax
Ryanair responded to weekend speculation that the Irish Government will introduce a new EUR10 (air) travel tax in the budget by expressing concerns (a) that it will be discriminatory, if it doesn’t apply to competing ferry traffic, (b) that it will be double taxation of the unfairest kind at Dublin Airport, where the Government owned DAA monopoly is already taxing each departing passenger over EUR15 per ticket.
And Lastly, (c) if this rumoured EUR10 tax (which in many cases exceeds the average air fare at Shannon) will deal a devastating blow to the recent growth in low fare traffic to/from Shannon.
In responding to the probable tax increases in the Irish budget, Ryanair said that while it would be disappointed if such a disproportionate tax is levied on air passengers to/from Ireland, it is clear in the current environment that everyone, including air passengers would have to shoulder a reasonable proportion of this burden. However Ryanair said it would be entirely unfair for the Government to levy such a high rate of tax (a EUR10 tax equates to a 25% rate of tax on Ryanair’s average EUR40 fare) if at the same time the Government owned DAA monopoly continues to rip air passengers off with up to EUR15 per departing passenger at Dublin. Ryanair is calling on the Government to use its ownership of the DAA monopoly to ensure that these excessive and uncompetitive taxes at Dublin Airport were reduced by at least 50% (or EUR7.00 per ticket), in order to help consumers shoulder at least some of this burden of increased taxation and to avoid Government double taxation at Dublin Airport. Ryanair is also concerned that this taxation (if it only applies to air travel) will be discriminatory against air passengers, if it does not apply to competing ferry passengers. Ryanair called on the Government to level the playing field by applying a similar rate of travel tax to ferry traffic which from an environmental point of view accounts for double the rate of C02 emissions in the EU than air transport. The European Environmental Agency has confirmed that marine traffic accounts for some 5% of European C02 emissions, compared to air traffic which accounts for less than 2%. If this tourism tax is to be dressed up as an environmental measure, then Ryanair believes it should apply equally to ferry passengers, as well as air passengers in order to avoid distorting the market against air travel. Ryanair expressed its greatest concern at the effect that any such proposed travel tax will have on its low fare (loss making) base at Shannon. In the current year Ryanair expects to carry almost 1.9 million passengers to/from Shannon, however for 5 months of the year, the average fare paid by these passengers at Shannon is less than EUR10 per passenger. Accordingly this traffic simply cannot sustain a tax rate of over 100% (if a EUR10 air travel tax, is introduced) and if this tax is applied to low fare passengers travelling to/from Shannon, then it is inevitable that short-haul traffic to/from Shannon will collapse. Ryanair simply cannot deliver up to 2 million passengers annually at Shannon, if the average fares paid by these (mainly) visitor numbers, is to be increased by more than 100%, as a result of a travel tax. Ryanair called on the Government to review this tax in the case of Shannon Airport, since price sensitive passengers simply won’t travel to Shannon from Europe if a Government travel tax results in average air fares to/from Shannon being more than doubled. Ryanair will be seeking an urgent meeting with the Minister for Transport after Tuesday’s budget to outline its concerns about the impact of any such tax on Shannon Airport, which may lead to a substantial reassessment of Ryanair’s $400m investment in Shannon and the continuation of its loss making operations there.
(c) Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation. Date posted: 14-Oct-08
For in-depth analysis of the low cost airline sector worldwide, subscribe now to the peerless Peanuts! Weekly
|